The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous stars were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites offering both totally free casino-style games and financially rewarding rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as standard casinos, only without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue in 2015 alone. Now the business deals with accusations of unlawful gaming in a New york city claim that declares VGW uses star endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of stars from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions in between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements typically focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others lure customers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad flaunting Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever provided up.'

The discrepancy in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social casinos offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be used to open various functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting consumers to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit clients to submit mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, thus providing them a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a possibility to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital difference between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like gambling establishments.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the opportunity to win rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all kinds of daily companies in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many gambling market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the normal payout portion for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the income made by the business [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using clients the possibility to play casino-style video games for real rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over claims of prohibited sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to face comparable analysis.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been pointed out by courts and state attorney generals as essential consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for illegal gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are giving up significant tax and income opportunities as this gambling replaces that carried out through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current lawsuit, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New York state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

'We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, producing not just terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely safeguard any claim which might be brought against us.'

The problems in between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to predict a strong stance against prohibited gaming - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting apparently illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' agents responded to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to explain to consumers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'A few of our values are" our gamers come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious prohibited gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton